Forwarded comments from Orie Steele, incoming ART Area Director:
"Recommendations for zone operators and DNS server operators"
Define "large / small" better.
"Protocol compliance considerations"
Would be nice to see reporting recommendations, perhaps that make the failure
an internal cost for the failing component?... would not want a repeat of dmarc
though.
--
"Recommendations for zone operators and DNS server operators"
For what it's worth, and warning! this is a small thing, I think "zone operators" is a bit vague.
The presumed intent of the phrase given the recommendations in the document is to identify people responsible for the choice of records in a DNS zone as part of the target audience. However, in my experience
"zone" has many meanings outside of the DNS
"zone" as a concept is poorly understood amongst people who fit the implied target audience but who are not protocol afficionados
"zone operator" is not a term of art and could (I think) mean different things to different people
I think the intended group is "people who publish information in the DNS".
Forwarded comments from Orie Steele, incoming ART Area Director:
"Recommendations for zone operators and DNS server operators"
"Protocol compliance considerations"
--
For what it's worth, and warning! this is a small thing, I think "zone operators" is a bit vague.
The presumed intent of the phrase given the recommendations in the document is to identify people responsible for the choice of records in a DNS zone as part of the target audience. However, in my experience
I think the intended group is "people who publish information in the DNS".