search

ietf-wg-drip / draft-ietf-drip-registries

0 stars 0 forks source link

uas.icao.arpa vs. uas.icao.int #37

Closed boucadair closed 10 months ago

boucadair commented 1 year ago

from @evyncke :

why using .arpa in uas.icao.arpa ? and not simply uas.icao.int ?

This would remove IANA from the discussion (even if they are helpful) and avoid any business discussions between IANA and ICAO (at the expense of a liaison statement)

kc2rxo commented 1 year ago

Please see #39, as this directly relates to that issue.

mglt commented 1 year ago

The reasoning for the zone is unclear to me.

On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 4:42 PM Adam Wiethuechter @.***> wrote:

Please see #39 https://github.com/ietf-wg-drip/draft-ietf-drip-registries/issues/39, as this directly relates to that issue.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ietf-wg-drip/draft-ietf-drip-registries/issues/37#issuecomment-1728398242, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABSL7STOZTLCCUXKRGV7G2LX3NIKXANCNFSM6AAAAAA2PYHWX4 . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.*** com>

-- Daniel Migault Ericsson 8400 boulevard Decarie Montreal, QC H4P 2N2 Canada

Phone: +1 514-452-2160

kc2rxo commented 1 year ago

The whole reasoning behind such a zone is to support putting UAS Serial Numbers into DNS and giving them a common apex, which currently does not exist, to go under.

mglt commented 1 year ago

Hi Adam,

Thanks for the response. What is unclear to me is why IANA is operating that zone on behalf of ICAO. Did we get any approval from IANA for uas.icao.arpa ?

Yours, Daniel

On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 11:06 PM Adam Wiethuechter @.***> wrote:

The whole reasoning behind such a zone is to support putting UAS Serial Numbers into DNS and giving them a common apex, which currently does not exist, to go under.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ietf-wg-drip/draft-ietf-drip-registries/issues/37#issuecomment-1728698761, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABSL7SQZWN4YLXXI5G63L23X3OVKZANCNFSM6AAAAAA2PYHWX4 . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

-- Daniel Migault Ericsson 8400 boulevard Decarie Montreal, QC H4P 2N2 Canada

Phone: +1 514-452-2160

kc2rxo commented 1 year ago

The inclusion of ICAO here at the time was due to our belief that ICAO can/would administrator such a zone.

There has been no formal liaison or discussion with ICAO on this, just informal ones where they may show interest. That is what the document had shown in the past.

So no there was no approval, as such the document sould have this whole bit removed in its entirety. If you check the new document [1] you will find that ICAO has been removed and the proposed apex (which is still WIP) is more generic under .arpa.

[1] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-wiethuechter-drip-uas-sn-dns-00.html#name-serial-numbers-in-dns