search

ietf-wg-emailcore / emailcore

3 stars 0 forks source link

G.7.11. Should 1yz Be Revisited? #18

Closed ietf-svn-bot closed 3 years ago

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

keyword_SMTP owner:alexey.melnikov@isode.com resolution_wontfix type_task | by alexey.melnikov@isode.com

RFC 5321 depreciated the "positive preliminary reply" response code category with first digit "1", so that the first digit of valid SMTP response codes must be 2, 3, 4, or 5. It has been suggested (see mail from Hector Santos with Subject "SMTP Reply code 1yz Positive Preliminary reply", March 5, 2020 12:56 -0500, on the SMTP list) that these codes should be reinstated to deal with some situations that became more plausible after 5321 was published. Do we need to take this back up?

Issue migrated from trac:18 at 2022-01-31 12:34:46 +0000

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com changed title from Should 1yz Be Revisited? to G.7.11. Should 1yz Be Revisited?

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com set component to smtp

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com commented

Started a 4 weeks call (ending on February 16th 2021) suggesting "no change", unless there is credible proposal in the form of a draft.

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com commented

Thread:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/HJhfumrhi6bKRkzjkHHkmn46bDc/

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com changed status from new to assigned

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com set owner to alexey.melnikov@isode.com

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com changed status from assigned to closed

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com set resolution to wontfix

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com commented

No proposals were received, so this issue is now closed.