Closed ietf-svn-bot closed 2 years ago
@alexey.melnikov@isode.com commented
As Abstract talks about use of SMTP for submission without mentioning RFC 6409, I agree it should be updated.
@alexey.melnikov@isode.com changed priority from major
to minor
@alexey.melnikov@isode.com commented
OLD: Although SMTP was designed as a mail transport and delivery protocol, this specification also contains information that is important to its use as a "mail submission" protocol for "split-UA" (User Agent) mail reading systems and mobile environments.
NEW: The document also provides information about use of SMTP for other than strict mail transport and delivery.
The idea is to mention RFC 6409 later in the document, not in the Abstract.
@alexey.melnikov@isode.com changed status from new
to closed
@alexey.melnikov@isode.com set resolution to fixed
@alexey.melnikov@isode.com commented
Implemented in -06.
resolution_fixed
type_defect
| by alexey.melnikov@isode.comJohn Klensin wrote:
Does the Abstract need to be modified in the light of RFC 6409 or
other changes?
Issue migrated from trac:52 at 2022-01-31 12:38:09 +0000