search

ietf-wg-emailcore / emailcore

3 stars 0 forks source link

G.7.1. "No mail accepted" situations and the 521, 554, and 556 codes #6

Closed ietf-svn-bot closed 2 years ago

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

keyword_SMTP owner:alexey.melnikov@isode.com resolution_fixed type_defect | by alexey.melnikov@isode.com

See new Section 4.2.4.2. More text may be needed, there or elsewhere, about choices of codes in response to initial opening and to EHLO, especially to deal with selective policy rejections.

Issue migrated from trac:6 at 2022-01-31 12:33:29 +0000

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com changed title from "No mail accepted" situations and the 521, 554, and 556 codes to G.7.1. "No mail accepted" situations and the 521, 554, and 556 codes

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com set component to smtp

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com commented

Also 4.2.2 and 4.2.3 need to be updated to match. In particular, the description of 554 is not very clear at the moment.

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com commented

In -03 John also added:

G.7.18. More Text About 554 Given 521, etc. 

   Does reply code 554 need additional or different explanation in the  
   light of the addition of the new 521 code and/or the new (in 5321bis 
   Section 4.2.4.2?  (See CREF in Section 4.2.3.)
ietf-svn-bot commented 2 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com commented

Text in 4.2.2/4.2.3 was updated to match. This ticket is ALMOST ready for closure.

John Levine agreed with the following proposal by John Klensin:

Should we aspire to get enough of the text from RFCs 1846, 7504, and maybe 7505 into 5321bis to obsolete those specs entirely (even if they are used as historical references)?

ietf-svn-bot commented 2 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com changed status from new to assigned

ietf-svn-bot commented 2 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com set owner to alexey.melnikov@isode.com

ietf-svn-bot commented 2 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com commented

Note about RFC 7504/RFC 7505 added in draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis-05, so the ticket can now be closed.

ietf-svn-bot commented 2 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com changed status from assigned to closed

ietf-svn-bot commented 2 years ago

@alexey.melnikov@isode.com set resolution to fixed