Would it be valuable to express a preference for yaml over yml for file extensions? I'm assuming 3 character extensions are legacy from DOS file systems that had a 3 character limit. I reviewed the YAML 1.2 spec and there is no mention of using yml as a file extensions, so this might be a good opportunity to steer the community away from having two extensions.
Would it be valuable to express a preference for
yaml
overyml
for file extensions? I'm assuming 3 character extensions are legacy from DOS file systems that had a 3 character limit. I reviewed the YAML 1.2 spec and there is no mention of usingyml
as a file extensions, so this might be a good opportunity to steer the community away from having two extensions.