appendix numbering

[reschke]

   Appendix C.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  26
   Appendix D.  FAQ  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  26
   RateLimit fields currently used on the web  . . . . . . . . . . .  29
   Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  31
     Since draft-ietf-httpapi-ratelimit-headers-01 . . . . . . . . .  31
     Since draft-ietf-httpapi-ratelimit-headers-00 . . . . . . . . .  31
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  31

"Acknowledgements" should be last in the spec, and unnumbered.

Why, on the other hand, is "RateLimit fields currently used on the web" unnumbered?

[ioggstream]

Thanks @reschke ! TODO:

• [x] Acks unnumbered
• [x] FAQ add RFC Editor: Please remove this section before publication.
• [x] Ratelimit fields currenty used, add RFC Editor: Please remove this section before publication. because it is only useful to explain current design choices. Once this is published and decisions are taken, it's not useful anymore.