ietf-wg-httpapi / rfc7807bis

Revision of RFC7807: HTTP Problem Details
Other
20 stars 8 forks source link

provide guidance for intentionally non-dereferencable URIs #21

Closed dret closed 3 years ago

dret commented 3 years ago

11 provides good guidance in terms of probably bets avoiding relative URIs. what about also providing guidance for people who intentionally want to use non-dereferencable URIs for type or instance? should we add some guidance for this as well? we had some discussion around tag URIs in #11 and there are other possibilities as well. but the main question is: if somebody never intends to use dereferencable URIs for type or instance, should we mention that and provide guidance?

mnot commented 3 years ago

Is this a duplicate of #13?

pimterry commented 3 years ago

I think this is indeed a duplicate

mnot commented 3 years ago

Closing for now; if there's a reason to distinguish it we can reopen.