F3-CT-Issue-2: Scaling Discussion

ietf-wg-idr / draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct

1 stars 2 forks source link

F3-CT-Issue-2: Scaling Discussion #2

Closed kalirajv closed 1 year ago

kalirajv commented 1 year ago

Add text on why CT uses RFC8277 (Appendix) that includes scaling discussion. Sizing discussion should reference the following (at least): draft-hr-spring-intentaware-routing-using-color-00#section-6.3.2, and packing for SRv6 SIDs

suehares commented 1 year ago

This issue is closed with the publication of draft-ietf-idr-ct-12. A review of the text by Jeff Haas, Keyur Patel, and Jie Dong may cause this issue to be reopened.