search

ietf-wg-idr / draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct

1 stars 2 forks source link

Section 3 - editorial nits #38

Closed suehares closed 10 months ago

suehares commented 11 months ago

4) Minor Nits Section 3.0.

Keyur: Please Define L1, L2, L3, L4.

            Please Define IP1, IP2, IP3, IP4 (BGP-LU/underlay prefixes)
suehares commented 11 months ago

Response from Kaliraj

KV> IP1, IP2, IP3 are Service family Prefixes (e.g. AFI/SAFI: 1/1). It is shown in the figure as ‘INET Service’. I can clarify this in the text.

suehares commented 11 months ago

it seems that IP1, IP2, and IP3 are related to Scheme 1-3.n

Resolution Schemes Transport Route DB ================== ==========
Scheme 1 (IP1) color: 0:100 (TRBD[TC-100], TRDB[TC-BE]) Scheme 2 (IP2) color: 0:200 (TRBD[TC-200], TRDB[TC-BE]) Scheme 3 (IP3) 100:200 (TRBD[TC-100], TRDB[TC-200] ^^^^ ^^^^^ Transport Class ID

suehares commented 11 months ago

Section 3.0.

BGP CT family carries transport prefixes across tunnel domain boundaries (e.g., in inter-AS Option C networks), which is parallel to BGP LU (AFI/SAFIs 1/4 or 2/4). #Keyur: Please consider removing (e.g., in inter-AS Option C networks). Kaliraj reponse: KV> it is helpful in clarifying BGP CT is applicable to option-C networks. KV> This was added based on suggestions in some previous reviews. Sue> The paragraph starting with "BGP CT family carries transport prefixes across tunnel domains" does not hold together well. I think you need to think about the editorial flow. Here's my understanding of this paragraph in the flow 1. The paragraph starting with (The underlay route ... ) introduces the concept of CT families as a way to extend an underlay tunnel to adjacent domains. 2. This paragraph (that starts with BGP CT family) does xx as compare with BGP-LU. 3. The paragraph following (that starts with IN figure 1), gives the example. Is this your logic flow?
suehares commented 11 months ago

Merging Jon Hardwick's comments and Keyur's comments into section 3.

Jon Hardwick's comments: 3 Architecture Overview - what are IP1..IP3? IP prefixes reachable via PE11? Not sure if these should say EP1..EP3 per the terminology section.

Keyur's editorial changes Section 3.0.

BGP CT family carries transport prefixes across tunnel domain boundaries (e.g., in inter-AS Option C networks), which is parallel to BGP LU (AFI/SAFIs 1/4 or 2/4).

Keyur: Please consider removing (e.g., in inter-AS Option C networks).

Kaliraj response to Keyur in email KV> it is helpful in clarifying BGP CT is applicable to option-C networks. KV> This was added based on suggestions in some previous reviews.

suehares commented 11 months ago

Jie Dong's comments

Section 3 Architecture overview

“Overlay routes carry sufficient indication of the desired Transport Classes using a BGP community which assumes the role of as a "Mapping Community". A Resolution Scheme is identified by its "Mapping Community", where its configuration can either be auto-generated based on TC ID or done manually.”

Jie: suggest to be more accurate on “a BGP community” here. Can any type of BGP community/extended community/large community be used for the role of “mapping community”.

kalirajv commented 10 months ago

addressed