Shepherd's report for -04.txt

[suehares]

Issues to add to the Shepherd's report:

Issue-15 - Binding RTG-DIR Issue-15: Section 2.4.3 - SRv6 Binding SID + Binding SID - Why 2?

RTG-DIR Issue-19: Normal Invalidity checks Unclear why the normal checks that are done on the TEA that would easily identify:

• Empty segment list,
• Weight of zero

Given the Segment types list in the draft, why is the check for

• It comprises a mix of SR-MPLS and SRv6 segment types.

This means that the basic format check would be done in the BGP process as part of the TEA validation.

[suehares]

Closing as content added to Shepherd Report on RTG-DIR review