Closed suehares closed 3 months ago
Issues to add to the Shepherd's report:
Issue-15 - Binding RTG-DIR Issue-15: Section 2.4.3 - SRv6 Binding SID + Binding SID - Why 2?
RTG-DIR Issue-19: Normal Invalidity checks Unclear why the normal checks that are done on the TEA that would easily identify:
Given the Segment types list in the draft, why is the check for
This means that the basic format check would be done in the BGP process as part of the TEA validation.
Closing as content added to Shepherd Report on RTG-DIR review
Issues to add to the Shepherd's report:
Issue-15 - Binding RTG-DIR Issue-15: Section 2.4.3 - SRv6 Binding SID + Binding SID - Why 2?
RTG-DIR Issue-19: Normal Invalidity checks Unclear why the normal checks that are done on the TEA that would easily identify:
Given the Segment types list in the draft, why is the check for
This means that the basic format check would be done in the BGP process as part of the TEA validation.