Closed suehares closed 3 months ago
RTG-DIR Issue 4 Status: resolved, closed
KT It is needed. RR is not required and not used in many deployments that I know of. It is a direct peering from controller to router. Jeffrey: OK if you say the most BGP deployment is not through RR 😊 How is further propagation prevented after the headend is reached?
KT: This is covered in section 4.2.3
Shepherd comment: Textin 4.2.3: /SR Policy NLRIs that have the NO_ADVERTISE community attached to them MUST NOT be propagated./
Perhaps the text could be modified as follows:
Text:/
An SR Policy intended only for the receiver will, in most cases, not
traverse any Route Reflector (RR, [RFC4456]). (See section 4.2.3). /
RTG-DIR Issue 4: Introduction (Section 1) in paragraph 12
Text:/ An SR Policy intended only for the receiver will, in most cases, not traverse any Route Reflector (RR, [RFC4456])./
Jeffrey: Is the above paragraph correct/needed. I suppose in most cases they will traverse RR after all - whether it is from a controller or an egress PE.