suehares
commented
3 months ago Shepherd's comment on paragraph 14:
Introduction's text: / The BGP extensions for the advertisement of SR Policies include following components:
-
A Subsequent Address Family Identifier (SAFI) whose NLRIs identifies an SR Policy candidate path.
-
A Tunnel Type identifier for SR Policy, and a set of sub-TLVs to be inserted into the Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute (as defined in [RFC9012]) specifying segment lists of the SR Policy candidate path, as well as other information about the SR Policy.
-
One or more IPv4 address specific format route target extended community ([RFC4360]) attached to the SR Policy advertisement and that indicates the intended headend of such an SR Policy advertisement./
Shepherd's suggested change suggested in this paragraph: Old text: /
- One or more IPv4 address specific format route target extended community ([RFC4360]) attached to the SR Policy advertisement and that indicates the intended headend of such an SR Policy advertisement./ New text: /
- One or more IPv4 address specific format route target extended community ([RFC4360]) attached to the SR Candidate Policy advertisement and that indicates the intended headend of such an SR Policy advertisement./
Note: Bold is simply for clarity on what needs to change.
Ketan's comment agrees that it is SR Candidate Paths: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/0NtYL2BshwzJiS5uTCDUYxec0OM/
RTG-DIR Issue-6: Introduction (Section 1) in paragraph 14
Text:/ The BGP extensions for the advertisement of SR Policies include following components:/
Jeffrey: The BGP extensions is for the advertisement of SR Policy Candidate Paths not SR Policies themselves, right?
[snip ... further in paragraph 14]
One or more IPv4 address format route target extended community ([RFC4360]) attached to the SR Policy advertisement and that indicates the intended headend of such an SR Policy advertisement./
Jeffrey: and IPv6? s/format/specific/?