Closed glyn closed 1 year ago
Please see my comment on the issue.
I think we need more semantic text to define what we're looking for.
Please see my comment on the issue.
I think we need more semantic text to define what we're looking for.
I've reworked the text in c7f54040f56756c2dd10e05cebbaa0d1a8fb31c1 to make the semantics much more obvious.
Give an example to emphasise the spec behaviour. At the time of writing, this disagrees with the implementation consensus here:
https://cburgmer.github.io/json-path-comparison/results/union_with_keys_after_recursive_descent.html
Fixes https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/265