Closed glyn closed 1 year ago
@cabo I take your point about this PR not being easy to review. I will think again.
(Let me just add that being explicit about these things is a significant improvement, but the explanations should not assume that the reader has a specific misunderstanding and try to talk them out of it -- that creates new misunderstandings.)
(Let me just add that being explicit about these things is a significant improvement, but the explanations should not assume that the reader has a specific misunderstanding and try to talk them out of it -- that creates new misunderstandings.)
Very helpful thanks. Let's address this change with a few tiny PRs.
Fixes https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/299