The editorial suggestions are trying to be a bit more idiomatic and improve flow; my feelings will not be hurt by any rejections.
I'm not sure the spec quite covers index selectors of the form [5:] so I tried adding that. If I got it wrong, that may be a symptom of an editorial problem.
I think it's bad form to use the word "canonical" without saying what you mean, so I removed it from section 2.9.
The editorial suggestions are trying to be a bit more idiomatic and improve flow; my feelings will not be hurt by any rejections.
I'm not sure the spec quite covers index selectors of the form [5:] so I tried adding that. If I got it wrong, that may be a symptom of an editorial problem.
I think it's bad form to use the word "canonical" without saying what you mean, so I removed it from section 2.9.