Review Digital Map Analysis

[italobusi]

I have started to review the initial version of the Digital Map Analysis. This is the status of my (incomplete) review up to now:

RFC8345 Augmentations - ib.xlsx

Few issues I have with the formatting of the information:

• some models/I-Ds have been superseded: to avoid duplicated information they should be either removed or properly marked in the maturity level
• the classification of the maturity level is not fully clear and it does not help assessing the impacts on modules which are in published RFCs, in RFC Editors Queue, in IESG processing, close to WG LC, active WG document or initial individual proposals

[OlgaHuawei]

Thanks for the initial review. Can we discuss it in Vancouver? I used yang catalogue for maturity, but it has some bugs and it does not identify deprecated or expired versions. I added columns for deprecated or expired, let me know if you have any specificcomments. You can filter using these. For maturity, I need to go one by one to verify if yang catalog showed the correct maturity level.