Closed hannestschofenig closed 1 month ago
I do understand the intent, but it would seem that distinguished name is not clearly going to have a specific reference we can use. That reference sets aside the regex requirement. I understand the need but there is some assorted LDAP RFCs and other attempts, but none seem to be the right kind of reference, even if about distinguished names in X.509.
I am going to propose we go back to what we know and then put forward my understanding and interpretation of the requirement, that we want a StringOrURI like the underlying CWT requires, perhaps with added length requirements?
What is the "regular expression of a distinguished name"?