Closed SteveLasker closed 3 days ago
in general the concept LGTM! For future: Just a word of caution: We should make every effort to make the Architecture, look simple. Too many boxes, complicate the diagram.
Also, any reason why you removed cose_sign1
It was super helpful to understand that the Signed Statement was cose_sign1
@yogeshbdeshpande the reason was to keep the diagram high level, and leave details to spec text
Also, any reason why you removed
cose_sign1
It was super helpful to understand that the Signed Statement wascose_sign1
As expected, but I would like to amplify Yogesh's question.
As expected, but I would like to amplify Yogesh's question.
We did discuss this on the call, and @OR13 's comment sums up our conversation:
@henkbirkholz, are you blocking, or are you ok if we merge the current simplified version?
I am okay with the new version. We might apply of different meaning to the term "simplified" ☺️
From the editors call on 11/12/24