Closed metagn closed 1 year ago
This exploits a weird behavior in the compiler that is planned to be discouraged, see https://github.com/nim-lang/RFCs/issues/486. do: and do (): are supposed to mean different things, in this case do (): is meant.
do:
do ():
Seems like the right change to me. I'll merge once the tests pass.
Live now in v4.0.1
Thanks for the PR!
This exploits a weird behavior in the compiler that is planned to be discouraged, see https://github.com/nim-lang/RFCs/issues/486.
do:
anddo ():
are supposed to mean different things, in this casedo ():
is meant.