The binding-table-versioning container's "version" leaf is of type uint64
but the in-module description indicates that it is a timestamp. If it is
actually supposed to be a timestamp, then the units and zero time need to
be specified, but it seems more likely that this should just be described
as an abstract version number, if I understand the prose text about this
container correctly.
boucadair
commented
5 years ago
The binding-table-versioning container's "version" leaf is of type uint64 but the in-module description indicates that it is a timestamp. If it is actually supposed to be a timestamp, then the units and zero time need to be specified, but it seems more likely that this should just be described as an abstract version number, if I understand the prose text about this container correctly.