Closed kingofoz closed 7 years ago
Those look like reasonable samples to me. Because 64x64 Imagenet is very diverse, nobody has managed to generate anything more than "vaguely realistic colorful blobs" yet. Re. the cost numbers, those sound reasonable, but using them for architecture search isn't yet a good idea because they depend on the critic architecture. For ImageNet, I'd just take the last iteration since overfitting is unlikely to be a major concern.
Thanks, I got it! @igul222 For the the other dataset, for example, Toy, MNIST, gan_language.py and CIFAR-10, how do you choose a good architecture?
Thanks, Yingjun
Hi @igul222 Please see the generated samples at iteration 199999. Is the result good? I am not sure what are generated. :-) At the final iteration 199999, train disc cost is -1.49 and dev disc cost is -1.6. Is this good? I am not sure how to choose the best model in all iterations.
Thanks, Yingjun