Adventure map, maximum spell points after heroes' meeting with artifact exchange concerning the hero's knowledge

[LeHerosInconnu]

Preliminary checks

• [X] I've checked that there aren't other open issues on the same topic.
• [X] I've checked that this issue is reproducible on the latest snapshot build.

Platform

Windows

Describe the bug

During a meeting, when two heroes exchange artifacts that modify the maximum spell point total linked to the hero's knowledge, the maximum spell point total of the hero with a number greater than the new maximum total should be adjusted. This is the case in the original game.

In the example, Ariel has 150 spell points corresponding to the maximum she can have with her knowledge of 15. The Ultimate Book of Knowledge artifact gives her 12 of these 15 knowledge points. When the Ultimate Book of Knowledge artifact is transferred to the hero Arie, Ariel's knowledge is reduced to 3 knowledge points.

At the end of the meeting, Ariel's spell points should therefore be reduced to 30 spell points, rather than remaining at 150 spell points. But beware, this change in the number of spell points should only take effect just after the meeting window closes, so that the player can move artifacts from one hero to another several times if he changes his mind without losing the hero's spell points (there's a bug in the original game regarding this). However, the hero spell points indicator bar (in the hero list) should be updated before returning to the adventure map screen after the meeting.

In the example, if Ariel goes to the Artesian Spring before the meeting, her spell points will increase to 300 spell points. If during the meeting Ariel gives the Ultimate Book of Knowledge artifact to Arie, she will have 30 spell points after the meeting (the maximum she can have) and not 60 spell points. If Ariel wants 60 spell points, she should visit the Artesian spring after giving the Ultimate Book of Knowledge artifact to Arie during the meeting.

In fheroes2:

https://github.com/ihhub/fheroes2/assets/43583994/8cdcc79a-7888-419b-b935-6b46ee9a80af

Save file

Here is the save file: Max spell poin after meeting_.zip

Additional info

No response

[oleg-derevenetz]

To be honest, I don't find this mechanics sane. As far as I understand, this has been fixed in HoMM3 and subsequent games of the series:

https://github.com/ihhub/fheroes2/assets/32623900/8e2df5b4-91b0-451c-890b-e079f5e65b0a

The whole idea is that the already existing number of spell points is not changed when hero's Knowledge is changed. In this video Sorsha got 5 Knowledge due to the Crown of the Supreme Magi artifact (+4 Knowledge) and got 100SP due to Mana Vortex, and after he transferred this Crown to another hero, he still has 100SP despite having just 1 Knowledge.

But beware, this change in the number of spell points should only take effect just after the meeting window closes, so that the player can move artifacts from one hero to another several times if he changes his mind without losing the hero's spell points (there's a bug in the original game regarding this).

I'd say that this whole mechanics is a bug, which has been fixed in subsequent versions.

[kitovyj]

Yes, it's hard to tell what is better. On one hand the preservation of mana allows exploiting artifact exchange to recharge multiple heroes manas above their "intrinsic" knowledge level. On the other hand, resetting doubled mana to 'normal' amount just because a hero lost only 1 point of knowledge due to artifact exchange seems strange and maybe suprising the the player. I would vote for leaving it as it is.

[oleg-derevenetz]

On one hand the preservation of mana allows exploiting artifact exchange to recharge multiple heroes manas above their "intrinsic" knowledge level.

This is not so easy to exploit because you need to have both an artifact, a courier hero (or even a whole chain of heroes) and also some mana replenishment object (such as Well) near each hero to recharge. Otherwise, such a recharge will take a lot of game time.

[kitovyj]

On one hand the preservation of mana allows exploiting artifact exchange to recharge multiple heroes manas above their "intrinsic" knowledge level.

This is not so easy to exploit because you need to have both an artifact, a courier hero (or even a whole chain of heroes) and also some mana replenishment object (such as Well) near each hero to recharge. Otherwise, such a recharge will take a lot of game time.

Yes, I don't remember I ever used such a trick, game time is too precious.

[kitovyj]

On one hand the preservation of mana allows exploiting artifact exchange to recharge multiple heroes manas above their "intrinsic" knowledge level.

This is not so easy to exploit because you need to have both an artifact, a courier hero (or even a whole chain of heroes) and also some mana replenishment object (such as Well) near each hero to recharge. Otherwise, such a recharge will take a lot of game time.

An interesting solution could be to use the formula "if mana > current_knowledge10 then mana = floor(mana current_knowledge / old_knowledge)" . It would preserve the flavour of the original game, prevent the boring exploit and allow to avoid strange "spring-boosted mana reset" after artifact exchanges.

[oleg-derevenetz]

An interesting solution could be to use the formula "if mana > current_knowledge10 then mana = floor(mana current_knowledge / old_knowledge)" . It would preserve the flavour of the original game, prevent the boring exploit and allow to avoid strange "spring-boosted mana reset" after artifact exchanges.

Any behavior that will differ both from OG behavior and from the behavior of subsequent games of HoMM series (the "fixed" one, I believe) looks doubtful IMHO. I'd just leave the current behavior (the same as in subsequent HoMM games) as is.

[ihhub]

Let's keep it the logic the same as in the original game which is the current behavior.

[oleg-derevenetz]

Hi @ihhub

Let's keep it the logic the same as in the original game which is the current behavior.

The problem is that the original game has a different logic :)

In the example, Ariel has 150 spell points corresponding to the maximum she can have with her knowledge of 15. The Ultimate Book of Knowledge artifact gives her 12 of these 15 knowledge points. When the Ultimate Book of Knowledge artifact is transferred to the hero Arie, Ariel's knowledge is reduced to 3 knowledge points.

At the end of the meeting, Ariel's spell points should therefore be reduced to 30 spell points, rather than remaining at 150 spell points. But beware, this change in the number of spell points should only take effect just after the meeting window closes, so that the player can move artifacts from one hero to another several times if he changes his mind without losing the hero's spell points (there's a bug in the original game regarding this).

@LeHerosInconnu just believes that the bug is only that the SP changes are applied immediately after moving the artifact, while I believe that the bug is is that these changes are taking place at all.

[LeHerosInconnu]

Hello everyone,

The problem is that by keeping the extra spell points above the maximum possible level, it becomes easy to abuse the functioning. The hero fills up his spell points with lots of Knowledge artifacts and then exchanges them for Attack, Defense and/or Spell Power artifacts. The hero is then much stronger in attack defense and/or spell power and with lots of spell points without worrying about Knowledge artifacts. This becomes a "trick" advantage, even if it's only for two or three consecutive combats, that can easily be reproduced by the player.

In the original game, if during a meeting between heroes, a Knowledge artifact is moved in the same inventory (for example, the player rearranges the position of artifacts in the inventory of one of his heroes for greater clarity or whatever), the extra spell points above the maximum possible level are removed. I consider this a bug.

Edit.

It should also be noted that in Heroes 3, artifact types occupy very specific slots, and it is not possible to replace a Knowledge artifact with an Attack artifact, for example.

[oleg-derevenetz]

The problem is that by keeping the extra spell points above the maximum possible level, it becomes easy to abuse the functioning. The hero fills up his spell points with lots of Knowledge artifacts and then exchanges them for Attack, Defense and/or Spell Power artifacts.

It's not so easy, because you should have not just the artifacts, but also the mana sources, like Well, somewhere nearby, so you cannot just bring some set of artifacts anywhere you like and get all the benefits. Also in HoMM2 this mechanics is obviously bugged, and in later HoMMs it is completely absent, there is no way to decrease already existing MP by removing artifacts in them.

[LeHerosInconnu]

Hello @oleg-derevenetz,

The problem is that by keeping the extra spell points above the maximum possible level, it becomes easy to abuse the functioning. The hero fills up his spell points with lots of Knowledge artifacts and then exchanges them for Attack, Defense and/or Spell Power artifacts.

It's not so easy, because you should have not just the artifacts, but also the mana sources, like Well, somewhere nearby, so you cannot just bring some set of artifacts anywhere you like and get all the benefits. Also in HoMM2 this mechanics is obviously bugged, and in later HoMMs it is completely absent, there is no way to decrease already existing MP by removing artifacts in them.

You replied before my edit in the previous post. :) So: "It should also be noted that in Heroes 3, artifact types occupy very specific slots, and it is not possible to replace a Knowledge artifact with an Attack artifact, for example." It's a different system.

[oleg-derevenetz]

It should also be noted that in Heroes 3, artifact types occupy very specific slots, and it is not possible to replace a Knowledge artifact with an Attack artifact, for example.

This is not quite the case. For example, you can put the Crown of Supreme Magi on first, get the additional mana, and then replace it by the Spellbinder's Hat and get all level 5 spells for this additional mana.

[LeHerosInconnu]

@oleg-derevenetz.

It should also be noted that in Heroes 3, artifact types occupy very specific slots, and it is not possible to replace a Knowledge artifact with an Attack artifact, for example.

This is not quite the case. For example, you can put the Crown of Supreme Magi on first, get the additional mana, and then replace it by the Spellbinder's Hat and get all level 5 spells for this additional mana.

This is a "trick" advantage of the Heroes 3 system, that can therefore also be manipulated. :) The Heroes 2 system is better in this case.

Anyways, in Heroes 3 a Knowledge artifact cannot be replaced by an Attack artifact.

In Heroes 2, with the "universal slots" in the hero's inventory, the removal of the extra spell points above the maximum possible level acts as a safeguard.

[oleg-derevenetz]

Anyways, in Heroes 3 a Knowledge artifact cannot be replaced by an Attack artifact.

In fact, not everything works so straightforwardly there. For example, you can put on the Sword of Judgement first (all +5), get additional mana (even double it in the Mana Vortex) and then replace this sword by Titan's Gladius (attack +12). The same is with torso - Armor of Wonder vs Dragon Scale Armor, etc.

[LeHerosInconnu]

@oleg-derevenetz.

Anyways, in Heroes 3 a Knowledge artifact cannot be replaced by an Attack artifact.

In fact, not everything works so straightforwardly there. For example, you can put on the Sword of Judgement first (all +5), get additional mana (even double it in the Mana Vortex) and then replace this sword by Titan's Gladius (attack +12). The same is with torso - Armor of Wonder vs Dragon Scale Armor, etc.

This leads to more "trick" advantages in the Heroes 3 system. And it also means more micro-management for players who want to optimize their heroes to the max. The Heroes 2 system is definitely better in this regard. :)

Anyways, the goal is not to make fheroes2 work like Heroes 3; it's Heroes 2 we're dealing with. :)

[Branikolog]

Hi, @LeHerosInconnu ! I personally agree with @oleg-derevenetz . Reducing mana after a hero has took away artifact +knowledge seem to be broken. Especially considering the fact, that in other circumstances heroes can have more mana points than knowledge allows them to have. The logic mentioned in the issue seems straightforward only if we have a hero with full mana. What if the hero has visited artesian spring and doubled his mana reserves? After removing artifact how many mana points do you expect to have? 30? Or 60? What if the hero has already consumed part of these points? Keeping mana points after meeting two is quite clear and straightforward behaviour. It could be abused in some rare cases (two heroes, well nearby, a couple of artifacts "+knowledge" and sufficient backpack slots), but is this the only case when a player tries to get some benefits from the game? :)

[LeHerosInconnu]

Hello @Branikolog,

What if the hero has visited artesian spring and doubled his mana reserves? After removing artifact how many mana points do you expect to have? 30? Or 60?

The answer to that was already written in the original post: :) "In the example, if Ariel goes to the Artesian Spring before the meeting, her spell points will increase to 300 spell points. If during the meeting Ariel gives the Ultimate Book of Knowledge artifact to Arie, she will have 30 spell points after the meeting (the maximum she can have) and not 60 spell points. If Ariel wants 60 spell points, she should visit the Artesian spring after giving the Ultimate Book of Knowledge artifact to Arie during the meeting."

It's also possible to improve the way the original game works, and at the same time reduce micromanagement (exchanging artifacts first during a meeting with another hero, and then going to the artesian spring), by making it so that when the hero obtains spell points in a specific way (by visiting an artesian spring, or whatever) he can keep his extra spell points.

In the case of the artesian spring, whose effect is to double the hero's spell points according to the hero's Knowledge, if the hero has already visited an artesian spring before making the artifact exchange, he is "marked" following this visit, and retains at most double the spell points corresponding to his final Knowledge after the meeting.

Examples:

• The hero has a Knowledge of 10 when he visits an artesian spring, not yet visited by a hero during the current week, and therefore obtains 200 spell points. The hero spends 47 spell points in combat, leaving 153 spell points. After exchanging artifacts during a meeting, the hero has Knowledge of 5. His spell points are therefore adjusted to 100 spell points, double his maximum standard points, as he is "marked" as having visited an artesian spring.
• The hero has a Knowledge of 10 when visiting an artesian spring not yet visited by a hero during the current week, and therefore obtains 200 spell points. The hero spends 47 spell points in combat, leaving 153 spell points. After exchanging artifacts during a meeting, the hero has Knowledge of 8. His spell points remain at 153 spell points, as he is "marked" as having visited an artesian spring, and he could retain up to 160 spell points, double his maximum standard points.

It could be abused in some rare cases (two heroes, well nearby, a couple of artifacts "+knowledge" and sufficient backpack slots), but is this the only case when a player tries to get some benefits from the game? :)

In Heroes 2, Knowledge cannot be abused, only in Heroes 3. So you want to reproduce the flawed operation of Heroes 3 in fheroes2? And will the AI also be able to make use of this wobbly operation? And why not make the other primary skills work the same way? After all, the hero has obtained +3 Attack with an artifact, so why take away this bonus when he gives the artifact to another hero? What if all spells were simply free to cast? What game would you like to play? :D

[oleg-derevenetz]

In Heroes 2, Knowledge cannot be abused, only in Heroes 3.

You call the behavior in the later games of the series "abuse", and the authors of this game mechanics, I suppose, call it "a reward for careful management and a, to a large extent, luck" (and probably also "a bugfix" - they fixed the original bug in their way, not in your way - although they certainly could have done it in your way). So it all depends on the point of view.

[LeHerosInconnu]

Hello @oleg-derevenetz,

In Heroes 2, Knowledge cannot be abused, only in Heroes 3.

You call the behavior in the later games of the series "abuse", and the authors of this game mechanics, I suppose, call it "a reward for careful management and a, to a large extent, luck" (and probably also "a bugfix" - they fixed the original bug in their way, not in your way - although they certainly could have done it in your way). So it all depends on the point of view.

To my Knowledge, :) fheroes2 is a remake of Heroes 2. Heroes 3 is based on a different artifact system.