Example Exchange Set for comment

[TomRichardson6]

All,

In readiness for further discussions I wanted to share an example S-100 Exchange Set which although it includes S-101 and S-102 datasets. IC-ENC now has a tool which allows us to generate S-100 Exchange Sets and this may be useful in supporting this work of this group. The Exchange Set simply uses dummy signatures so those should be ignored.

I would welcome any comments on the structure of the exchange set and content of the Catalog.xml provided here. Please ignore the datasets at this stage.

30c8098d-d886-4a7f-ad13-08a8299de281.zip

[IngaFjellanger]

Hi, About Catalog.xml: It says it is: _Based On: "Part XX Discovery Metadata and Exchange Catalogues_5.0.0_DraftRedline+07192021.doc" I could not find that version of the Part XX document, so I have used the most recent version I have , the one we got for the S-100WG6, _Part XX Discovery Metadata and Exchange Catalogues_5.0.0_Draft_Redline21122020 Cleaned up.doc . Several changes were added during the S-100WG6, but I do not have an updated version. I note that there must have been some changes done between the 2 versions of Part XX. So I have also compared with official version of S-100 edition 4 . The general impression is that there is so many changes that I will not use time on continuing investigating. I will only give some impressions based on investigating the beginning.

• Should empty tags like be included? It could be omitted since it is not mandatory.
• dateTime is encoded like 20220110T110843Z</S100XC:dateTime> which is correct according to my version of Part XX. All the other times dates and times are encoded it is done like e.g.: 2018-12-01</S100XC:date> and 00:00:00-05:00</S100XC:issueTime> The last way of encoding dates and times are according to what was decided during S-100WG6 .

[TomRichardson6]

Inga, thanks for your input, this tool is based on a pre S-100WG6 draft and therefore does not reflect changes posted there. I understand that its not useful to assess at this time but once a stable draft is available the tool will be updated and I will seek to upload a further exchange set for assessment against that draft.

[rmalyankar]

The S-100 metadata subgroup is still making changes to metadata for S-100 5.0 and the S-100 generic schemas will be updated after that is complete...

[DavidGrant-NIWC]

Recommend close as OBE - unable to load the catalog because it doesn't conform to the 5.0 schema.

[TomRichardson6]

Closed as OBE