systematically reports significantly lower values for this variable than other SR15 scenarios. My guess is that values for this variable were reported in GtCO2/yr sequested rather than MtCO2/yr.
Here is an example from the SR15 low and no overshoot scenario set that includes a variety of other models (you can see POLES at the bottom)
Our best guess is that these are off (too low) by a factor of 100
We noticed the following data for POLES
systematically reports significantly lower values for this variable than other SR15 scenarios. My guess is that values for this variable were reported in GtCO2/yr sequested rather than MtCO2/yr.
Here is an example from the SR15 low and no overshoot scenario set that includes a variety of other models (you can see POLES at the bottom)
Our best guess is that these are off (too low) by a factor of 100