Fix Sphinx nitpicks fron message_ix docs

khaeru commented 6 months ago

This PR adjusts some internal intersphinx references.

Where the following would ordinarily be sufficient for an internal reference:

:class:`.Platform`

…this leads to a missing reference when the docstring that contains it is included in the downstream (message_ix) docs.

This PR adjusts some of these references to, for instance:

:class:`.ixmp.Platform`

This has no effect on the appearance of the ixmp docs, but allows the reference target to be correctly identified downstream.

How to review

Read the diff and note that the CI checks all pass.

PR checklist

[x] Continuous integration checks all ✅
[x] ~Add or expand tests;~ coverage checks both ✅
[x] Add, expand, or update documentation.
~Update release notes.~ N/A, docs details only

codecov[bot] commented 6 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (be06f38) 98.6% compared to head (9579188) 98.9%.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #506 +/- ## ======================================= + Coverage 98.6% 98.9% +0.2% ======================================= Files 44 44 Lines 4794 4794 ======================================= + Hits 4729 4743 +14 + Misses 65 51 -14 ``` | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/iiasa/ixmp/pull/506?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=iiasa) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [ixmp/backend/\_\_init\_\_.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/iiasa/ixmp/pull/506?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=iiasa#diff-aXhtcC9iYWNrZW5kL19faW5pdF9fLnB5) | `100.0% <ø> (ø)` | | | [ixmp/core/timeseries.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/iiasa/ixmp/pull/506?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=iiasa#diff-aXhtcC9jb3JlL3RpbWVzZXJpZXMucHk=) | `98.7% <ø> (ø)` | | | [ixmp/report/operator.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/iiasa/ixmp/pull/506?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=iiasa#diff-aXhtcC9yZXBvcnQvb3BlcmF0b3IucHk=) | `99.0% <ø> (ø)` | | ... and [5 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/iiasa/ixmp/pull/506/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=iiasa)

glatterf42 commented 5 months ago

Rebased after dependabot update to main: I suppose this test failure is flaky. Should we include a corresponding marker?

iiasa / ixmp