Closed scparkinson closed 5 years ago
@scparkinson this looks very good to me. From a structure perspective, it might make sense to split the water section into water for energy, water for land and other uses (industry, residential). This would mirror the structure under emissions where we also have an energy and land part. Any thoughts on this?
I can definitely add the description of the other water uses but purposefully left out in this case because it was initially indicated just to include the water for energy part. Please let me know if you want me to add the description of the other water uses.
@scparkinson thanks for the offer, but I would suggest that for the moment we keep it at the level you have provided which is consistent with the mainstream version of the global model version. I just thought that structurally it would make sense to anticipate that other components than "water for energy" will be added at some point.
https://github.com/iiasa/message_doc/issues/18
18
Energy: add water for energy implementation @scparkinson