Automated Issue on branch notificaciones

[CodeWatchdog]

journey
title Scores History
section 276e433faa57d6d9c582590cdf7aa32d4a4aae8e
message: 3: luzmagurzua
vulnerability: 4: luzmagurzua

section d36687ad6284c83ba54586c68a15c1fb44962682
message: 3: luzmagurzua
vulnerability: 4: luzmagurzua

[CodeWatchdog]

Commit Review Summary [276e433faa57d6d9c582590cdf7aa32d4a4aae8e]

Author	Provided Message	Generated Message	Adherence Score	Comment
@luzmagurzua	'fix notificaciones'	'Add repeat options to notifications UI'	3 😐	The user-suggested message 'fix notificaciones' is vague and only indicates a fix. The changes are actually adding new features to the notification UI, which include repeat options and user interactions. A more descriptive commit message like 'Add repeat options to notifications UI' better captures the scope and purpose of the changes.

Code Complexity

Complexity Comment

The code complexity is moderate due to the addition of multiple state variables and event handlers for handling the new notification repeat options. The readability is decent, with meaningful variable names and comments explaining the functionality. However, the nested conditional rendering could be simplified to improve maintainability. Consider extracting some logic into custom hooks or separate components to reduce the cognitive load when reading the code.

Code Vulnerability

Score	Comment
4 😄	No apparent vulnerabilities related to common security issues like buffer overflows or improper input validation were detected. The code mainly involves UI logic, which generally poses fewer security risks. However, ensure that any data passed to and from these components is properly sanitized, especially if integrating with a backend service.

SOLID Principles

Principle	Score	Comment
Singleresponsibility	3 😐	The Notification component now handles several responsibilities, including state management for repeat options, rendering UI elements, and managing user interactions. Consider refactoring to separate concerns, possibly by creating smaller components for specific functionalities like handling repeat intervals.
Openclosed	4 😄	The code is generally open for extension with the addition of new unit options or handlers, but closed for modification as existing functionality is maintained. Future improvements could involve extracting configuration data, like the days of the week or repeat options, to external files or constants for easier updates.
Liskovsubstitution	5 😍	The Liskov Substitution Principle is not directly applicable here as there is no inheritance involved in the changes. The component remains interchangeable with its previous version in terms of interface and expected behavior.
Interfacesegregation	3 😐	While the component handles multiple aspects of notification settings, the interface it exposes could be fine-tuned. Breaking down the component into more focused, smaller components might help in adhering to the Interface Segregation Principle by ensuring each interface is minimal and specific.
Dependencyinversion	4 😄	The component relies on React's hooks and basic DOM elements, which is appropriate for this context. If there are plans to integrate more complex logic or services, consider using context or dependency injection patterns to manage dependencies more effectively.

[CodeWatchdog]

Commit Review Summary [d36687ad6284c83ba54586c68a15c1fb44962682]

Author	Provided Message	Generated Message	Adherence Score	Comment
@luzmagurzua	'fix: precios, codigos, notificaciones'	'Enhance UI and validation for user selection'	3 😐	The user-suggested message 'fix: precios, codigos, notificaciones' is too vague and doesn't clearly convey the scope of changes made in the commit. It uses non-English terms, which might not be clear to all contributors. A more descriptive message like 'Enhance UI and validation for user selection' would better capture the essence of the changes, specifically the UI improvements and validation additions.

Code Complexity

Complexity Comment

The commit introduces several changes primarily focused on UI enhancements and validation improvements in the React components for user selection. The complexity is moderate due to the addition of new state management and validation logic. The code readability is generally good, with consistent formatting and comments. However, the removal of inline styles and some refactoring of repeated code blocks could improve maintainability. Utilizing more reusable components could further simplify the code.

Code Vulnerability

Score	Comment
4 😄	No major vulnerabilities are apparent in the changes. The use of parseInt for input validation is a good practice to prevent non-numeric inputs. However, it's important to ensure that all inputs are sanitized to avoid potential injection attacks, even in seemingly safe contexts like user interfaces. Consider using libraries for input validation if not already in place.

SOLID Principles

Principle	Score	Comment
Singleresponsibility	3 😐	The components manage multiple states and UI concerns, which could be broken down into smaller, more focused components. This would adhere better to the Single Responsibility Principle by allowing each component to handle a specific part of the UI or logic.
Openclosed	3 😐	The current code structure is mostly open for extension but not entirely closed for modification. Future enhancements may require altering existing code rather than extending it. Introducing more modular components can help in adhering to the Open/Closed Principle.
Liskovsubstitution	5 😍	There are no issues with the Liskov Substitution Principle as there is no evident use of inheritance in the changes. Components and functions are self-contained and do not rely on subclass behavior.
Interfacesegregation	4 😄	The use of hooks and handlers is well-segregated, although some functions could be further split if they grow in complexity. Currently, interfaces (in this case, function signatures and props) are not overly broad.
Dependencyinversion	3 😐	The code primarily uses hooks and inline functions, which do not fully leverage dependency inversion. Introducing context or higher-order components could improve flexibility by decoupling components from their dependencies.