Open jmatsushita opened 8 years ago
It could be that for linking the fragment identifier is meant as a location whether for transclusion it is understood as a container. In some context s it might be needed to qualify in order to explicitly we express whether one or the other is meant.
Techniques to keep track of fragments across changes could be:
Maybe the problem can be split in:
It could be that web server would cache fragment retrieval sources in order to memorise what the client's expectations are. For larger volumes link versioning my be required so that the client refers to a particular point in time, minimising the effort on the server side.
HTTP moved status codes could be used to help update clients.
@jmatsushita
Inclusive section transclusion appears to over-transclude by a few characters:
# EtI Curriculum - TEST
Hi.
## Test transclusion
:[](test-folder/index##second-level-heading)
# Test page
Hi again.
## Second-level heading
Second level heading text
### Third-level heading
Third level heading text
### Another third-level heading
More third level heading text
## Another second-level heading
More second level heading text
If we have a
document.md
file with this content:I would like to be able to transclude a block inside this document for instance
Content 2.C
by using the syntax: