Closed cleymour closed 6 years ago
Implementation first please! :-) Could consider clarification that this is not in scope as practice is not established..
The following changes have been integrated in the revised ISO draft during the ISO working group meeting on November 16-17, 2015: at the end of section 6.3.2 and 6.5.2, replace/add last sentence: Conventions for recording information about the 'https' secure socket transaction, such as certificates exchanged, consulted, or verified, are not in the scope of this International Standard.
Included in WARC 1.1.
Definition: It is written in the WARC standards (6.3.2 and 6.5.2) : "This document does not specify conventions for recording information about the 'https' secure socket transaction, such as certificates exchanged, consulted, or verified".
This sentence looks misleading: it should not mean that implementers shouldn't record this kind of information (which is provenance information), but that the standard doesn't give any advice on how to do it.
Decision: This should be more clearly explained. One or two examples with possible (optional) solutions could be provided.
Action: Jack Cushman to propose a formulation.