Closed rath3t closed 10 months ago
Looks good from my side. We have to talk about fixing the member variable naming with the trailing
_
. Maybe someone can go through all files and fix it manually? Or we say: Everytime someone touches upon a file they should also check member variable
@henrij22 I think this change, along with using \
instead of &
for doxygen comments and further changes will be now done in #234 separately., while the focus here was only clang-format related changes. Am I right @rath3t ?
This PR is only the clang-format. In another one I would try to fix the member variables stuff.
Codecov Report
Attention:
140 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #243 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 92.73% 91.76% -0.97% ========================================== Files 53 53 Lines 1982 2029 +47 ========================================== + Hits 1838 1862 +24 - Misses 144 167 +23 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ikarus-project/ikarus/pull/243/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ikarus-project) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [tests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ikarus-project/ikarus/pull/243/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ikarus-project) | `91.76% <92.30%> (-0.97%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ikarus-project#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.