Closed ikawrakow closed 1 month ago
You should test the combo -ctk q6_0 -ctv q5_0. After a few PPL tests, it seems to be a keeper for me, to replace q5_1 - q5_0 and be quite close to the K q8_0 mixes in term of quality with much less VRAM occupation.
ON L3.1 8B Q5_K
PPL 512 211 chunks- K q5_1 / V q5_0 : 7.4175 - 46 MB
PPL 512 211 chunks - K q6_0 / V q5_0 : 7.3995 - 48 MB -> choice of the jury
PPL 512 211 chunks - K q8_0 / V iq4_nl : 7.4078 - 52MB
Main motivation was to see how it performs for quantized kv-cache. Disappointingly, it is slightly worse than
Q8_0
for K-cache andIQ4_NL
for V-cache (thisQ8_0
+IQ4_NL
combo needs the exact same memory asQ6_0
for both caches).Nevertheless, with a block size of 32 it is the same as the other legacy quants, beets
Q5_0
andQ5_1
with a significant margin for PPL (it is almost as good asQ6_K
), performance on Metal is quite a bit better thanQ5_0
andQ5_1
, etc. So that, once I did the work to implement and test, why not add it?