Open hartmark opened 1 year ago
Hello @hartmark
As far as I can see, the Idempotency-Key
header name is still an Internet-Draft. We can consider it as a work in progress. In addition, this will be a breaking change in the library.
However, I am unsure how the library is used and if the majority use the Idempotency-Key
header name.
cc: @dimmy-timmy, @kvuong, @bernardiego, @MohamadTahir, @Rast1234, @lvzhuye, @RichardGreen-IS2, @apchenjun, @william-keller, @fjsosa
i'm not an active user of your implementation, our impl uses custom header name because that standard is still a draft and we decided to ignore its existence until it's finished 😆 sticking to standards is good, but i'd contact someone responsible for that rfc to see if they are going to change header name. to avoid changing defaults again, you know
According to the rfc draft the proposed name would be Idempotency-Key so we should rename the default.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-idempotency-key-header/
Comments?