Open iljackb opened 4 years ago
@ana is a https://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-teidata.pointer.html attribute and should thus always comply to the URI syntax. I am not asking you to read the corresponding standard ;-): https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt but search for '#' in there and see for instance the general syntax description 3 (precise explanation in 3.5). You'll see that #xxxx marks a fragment identifier where the corresponding context can be made implicit. Long story short: you need to put '#' everywhere.
Ok got it. So should I stick with the abbreviated tags too then also?
Yes, but make sure that they resolve nicely (by default in the same document, unless you have an @xml:base declaration in an ancestor node.
Laurent, I seem to recall you telling me that when annotating grammar and other content using @ana that I should not put # in front of the tag unless the features are declared in the same document is that correct?
This is what I had been doing:
On a related note, I was annotating something last night and I had the urge to use the fully written values of the linguistic features (with the exception of number), eg.
Do you think one is better than the other? Since I can put the values as suggested values in the ODD schema it won't necessarily take more time..the alternative would thus be: