Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
er.. sorry, i got muddled up. the test SUCCEEDS with the code given, but FAILs
when
the copy constructor is removed.
the title of the bug is correct.
Original comment by infinity0x@gmail.com
on 5 Aug 2009 at 9:16
and again, as with issue#11, the test succeeds if the custom object is not part
of a
java bean. (ie. if you comment out "key4" stuff)
Original comment by infinity0x@gmail.com
on 5 Aug 2009 at 9:19
is it fixed already ?
Please check the patch with your test. I have uncommented everything but it
works.
Original comment by aso...@gmail.com
on 5 Aug 2009 at 1:11
Attachments:
ah, sorry, the patch is wrong, you should keep the comments surrounding
/*public Custom(Custom c) {
str = c.str;
}*/
(or delete the whole thing) - i got a bit confused during the description
but anyway, i ran the test (with that constructor **removed**) on the latest
hg, and
it passed (and failed on 1.3)
Original comment by infinity0x@gmail.com
on 5 Aug 2009 at 2:03
Indeed it fails on 1.3
I will mark the issue as fixed in 1.4
Original comment by py4fun@gmail.com
on 5 Aug 2009 at 4:32
Original comment by aso...@gmail.com
on 6 Aug 2009 at 9:58
Original comment by aso...@gmail.com
on 6 Aug 2009 at 10:03
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
infinity0x@gmail.com
on 5 Aug 2009 at 9:14