Closed jharwell closed 5 years ago
Updated with ARGoS style.
@ilpincy, @allsey87 Any thoughts? I've been using this in my ARGoS fork for about a month now and have been very pleased with the results, and have not seen any bugs arise, so I think it is ready for merging.
I'm working on a project proposal - as soon as the deadline has past (July 17) I'll take a look at the backlog of ARGoS requests, starting from this one.
For #89. There are also a few new const accessor functions that I added as well to improve the const-correctness of the project I have built on top of ARGoS.
@ilpincy, @allsey87 , what do you think? Is the interface/requirements/documentation reasonable and clear? What should be added or changed?