Closed MikeJ1971 closed 4 years ago
For the moment, we have the following:
<respStmt xml:id="peter-crooks">
<name>Peter Crooks</name>
<resp>editor</resp>
</respStmt>
<respStmt xml:id="paul-dryburgh">
<name>Paul Dryburgh</name>
<resp>editor</resp>
</respStmt>
<respStmt xml:id="lynn-kilgannon">
<name>Lynn Kilgannon</name>
<resp>editor</resp>
</respStmt>
<respStmt xml:id="elizabeth-biggs">
<name>Elizabeth Biggs</name>
<resp>editor</resp>
</respStmt>
<respStmt xml:id="mike-jones">
<name>Mike Jones</name>
<resp>editor</resp>
</respStmt>
<respStmt xml:id="brendan-smith">
<name>Brendan Smith</name>
<resp>editor</resp>
</respStmt>
This can be reviewed later if needed. Closing for now.
When we give a responsibility statement, i.e. a person who had some form of responsibility in creating the document, what should we record? In MPESE, it was the person's responsibility within the project, e.g. 'Principal Investigator', 'Co-Investigator', 'Research Associate', 'Research Software Engineer' etc.
Here, I've used the type of role given on the Beyond 2022 website:
However, I think, it can be specific to the document.
The guidelines are quite broad: "contains a phrase describing the nature of a person's intellectual responsibility, or an organization's role in the production or distribution of a work."
The guideline gives this example with a 'MARC Code List for Relators Scheme'
See: https://tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-resp.html See: http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators.html