search

imTHAI / adguardhome-unbound-redis

5 stars 0 forks source link

Anyway to check if redis is using cache? #6

Open up2you1 opened 1 week ago

up2you1 commented 1 week ago

Firstly great work with this, i used to use this one before: https://github.com/ar51an/unbound-redis but so much involved getting it to work, this docker in unraid is literraly plug and play, so hats off to you!

My question, because ADH optimistic cache isnt swtched on as its using unbound/redis, is there anyway to see if caching is working?

also i assume being redis, persistent caching is enabled so even when the docker is rebooted it would still keep cached entries yes?

Thanks!

imTHAI commented 1 week ago

Hello

You can check the entries in console, using redis-cli command. Then, inside the redis cli, you use the command KEYS * It will show you all the entries it has stored. It increases each time it stores a new one. In a fresh start you can easily see it increasing as you execute dns request in // to test

(I'm on my phone, I can't copy paste any screenshot, I hope you get it)

No if your redis container is restarted, every entries will be lost because, by default, Redis stores data in RAM. To retain data, you can use snapshotting (RDB) or Append-Only File (AOF). But I never tried.

Yes it's a great combo, my upstream is ~2ms response time, now. šŸ‘

up2you1 commented 1 week ago

Hello

You can check the entries in console, using redis-cli command. Then, inside the redis cli, you use the command KEYS * It will show you all the entries it has stored. It increases each time it stores a new one. In a fresh start you can easily see it increasing as you execute dns request in // to test

(I'm on my phone, I can't copy paste any screenshot, I hope you get it)

No if your redis container is restarted, every entries will be lost because, by default, Redis stores data in RAM. To retain data, you can use snapshotting (RDB) or Append-Only File (AOF). But I never tried.

Yes it's a great combo, my upstream is ~2ms response time, now. šŸ‘

Thank you, yes can see it increasing :)

im at 10ms, after only one evening, should get better over the next few days.

fonfinup commented 4 days ago

Hello, are you using it in recursive mode or with public DNS ?

I have deleted the "forward-queries.conf" file to use it as a recursive DNS but compared to you, I have a poor response time, 40ms after 2 days. My classical adguard docker without unbound have a 4ms response time.

Have I missed something ? Or should I use public DNS for better performance ? Thanks.

up2you1 commented 4 days ago

Hello, are you using it in recursive mode or with public DNS ?

I have deleted the "forward-queries.conf" file to use it as a recursive DNS but compared to you, I have a poor response time, 40ms after 2 days. My classical adguard docker without unbound have a 4ms response time.

Have I missed something ? Or should I use public DNS for better performance ? Thanks.

Iā€™m using it with public dns, yesterday was quad9, today Iā€™m trying ControlD

imTHAI commented 4 days ago

I use forwarding-queries. To Cloudflare dns which have the best answer time for me.

up2you1 commented 4 days ago

I use forwarding-queries. To Cloudflare dns which have the best answer time for me.

do you think the malware lists in Adguard is enough rather than using say Quad9 which as builtin malware?

imTHAI commented 4 days ago

Chances are that adguard's will be better and more frequently updated. Lists are a big part of their business, and they publish and maintain many of them. And of all bottles, more specifically, I don't like quad9. In the past they've had several breakdowns. Now, breakdowns happen to all companies, including adguard dns, but quad9 boasted 99.99% availability, even though we weren't there at all. After a few comments on twitter and some time passing, they removed their text from their site.

up2you1 commented 3 days ago

Chances are that adguard's will be better and more frequently updated. Lists are a big part of their business, and they publish and maintain many of them. And of all bottles, more specifically, I don't like quad9. In the past they've had several breakdowns. Now, breakdowns happen to all companies, including adguard dns, but quad9 boasted 99.99% availability, even though we weren't there at all. After a few comments on twitter and some time passing, they removed their text from their site.

thanks! ive given ControlD a try.