Closed JulianKnodt closed 3 years ago
right, so nothing super visible, just visiting the same pixels a few times leading to semi-incorrect results. The original paper also referenced 487 in it, so I assume this was just a typo transferring from the paper
The original prime seems to be:
public static final int prime3 = 487;
So exactly as corrected :)
I noticed this while attempting a larger refactor, but thought it worth making its own change. I think this was a typo, because it wasn't prime, but 487 is prime.