Closed cospectrum closed 5 months ago
I agree with removing the unused generics, I don't know how they got there. I disagree with removing the deprecation attributes as all those functions are inflexible and pollute the docs, especially if they ever got _parallel()
variants.
functions are inflexible and pollute the docs
And now we will pollute the user's codebase with long upper case variables and reimplementations
I think it's more readable as well tbh. Easier than having to look up the docs of one of 20 weirdly named functions every time I encounter one. I only have to learn one function filter_clamped
and then I as a reader will understand every call to it.
I’ve created https://github.com/image-rs/imageproc/issues/661 to discuss what API we actually want for filtering. So we can agree this in one place rather than going back and forth in pull requests. (I’m also tempted to name filter_clamped
just filter
as it seems the more useful function so deserves a shorter name.) I don’t want to keep churning function names on every release as this will cause repeated breaking changes for users and there are for more users than maintainers!
@cospectrum @ripytide I’ll merge this PR but will get consensus on the linked issue before releasing the next crate version.
@theotherphil Did you approve
deprectaed
macro? I don't like it. Andgradients_grayscale
hard to use because there are 3 unused generics