Closed hinerm closed 9 years ago
For Java8 compatibility we need to support Nashorn-based JavaScript. We need to do so in a way that preserves existing Rhino-based scripts.
Since we can't differentiate based on the .js extension, a few options would be:
.js
.nashorn.js
We also need to decide if there should be two JavaScript entries on the script language menu.
See also: https://github.com/imagej/imagej/issues/105
Duplicate of imagej/imagej#116.
For Java8 compatibility we need to support Nashorn-based JavaScript. We need to do so in a way that preserves existing Rhino-based scripts.
Since we can't differentiate based on the
.js
extension, a few options would be:.nashorn.js
extension with JSR-223 Nashorn JS engine.We also need to decide if there should be two JavaScript entries on the script language menu.
See also: https://github.com/imagej/imagej/issues/105