Closed elevans closed 1 year ago
Patch and project coverage have no change.
Comparison is base (
d99fcf0
) 77.60% compared to head (c5214a0
) 77.60%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
@elevans @gselzer what do you think about changing the verbosity in the affected notebooks to avoid these printouts? Is that a possibility?
I think this might be confusing for people and might generate erroneous bug reports. If someone sees our notebooks with the clean output but theirs is duplicating they might reach out to us.
@elevans I like all of the changes - in fact, most of my comments probably aren't related to your changes.
One final question - can you build the documentation? I ran
make docs && firefox doc/_build/html/index.html
, but it errors.
I wasn't able to reproduce this. This command works fine on my end. I did make setup
first which created the pyimagej-dev
environment and then the make docs
command without any issues.
This PR is in response to https://github.com/imagej/pyimagej/issues/271 and updates the version of ImageJ2/Fiji we use from
2.5.0
to2.13.1
. I also applied the following changes:03-Sending-Data-to-Java
with a slice of microtubules from a HeLa cell in metaphase that I took a few years back.