Closed mol666 closed 1 year ago
Hi @mol666, thanks for pointing this out! You are correct, we had the wrong output here. I'm pretty close to finishing a PR that will bring some updates to the documentation (either today or tomorrow). I will be sure to include this into https://github.com/imagej/pyimagej/pull/276. For now I'll keep this issue open until I get that merged into main
.
That's great! PyimageJ and what you developers do help me a lot. Sincere thanks to you!
This fix as been merged into main
: e50446ec204951dacd56605666191c60e33ff8df.
There are 32 cells detected, however the output has 32 group of datas which are completely same. They are just the measurements of the first cell. This line of code:
for column in results.getHeadings(): stats_ij[column].append(results.getColumn(column)[0])
should be modified to be:stats_ij[column].append(results.getColumn(column)[-1])
as the index while appending should be corrected.Hope some notice.