Closed MarkMDekker closed 9 months ago
Also, small observation: in CABE (= old global pathways, but still), if you set temperature at 2.4, and risk at 83%, the first part of ECPC is equal to if you put risk at 16%. Only the second part (>2040) gets 'pulled up'. Clearly this is wrong.
While testing Chantal's code (which was correct though), I did encounter that the ECPC curve per country seems a bit strange, with some form of un-smooth path around 2040.
Here's the world, nice and smooth:
Here's USA, ECPC:
The ECPC temporal allocation remains a bit of puzzle. Let's talk about that as well.