I noticed a bug when I execute the line just before the next cell (with # %%) and I remember vim line numbering starts at 1 not 0. So this must be a bug right? All ascend python code assumes we start at 0. Thoughts?
We recently fixed a numbering bug in the main jupyter_ascending repo - I'm guessing that was the problem here and not vim's numbering, but could be wrong.
I noticed a bug when I execute the line just before the next cell (with # %%) and I remember vim line numbering starts at 1 not 0. So this must be a bug right? All ascend python code assumes we start at 0. Thoughts?