Closed palmskog closed 5 years ago
AFAIR, we don't care about true
/false
here because we work under the assumption that interpreted terms are well-formed (there is all (wf i) ts
precondition for isundef_sound
lemma in the same file), meaning the else
case is unreachable.
OK, I see, thanks!
Consider the following alternative definition of
undefx
in automap.v where the firstfalse
is changed totrue
:All proofs, at least in fcsl-pcm, pass with this definition. Is there some proof in the full fcsl which proves something about the "vacuous" case when
onth (varx i) n = None
, or is there some intuition why this case should befalse
and nottrue
?