Open jakobmatthes opened 1 year ago
Calculation of trimmed base percentage assumes that all (most) alignments have the same length. For long read data, this is not valid. Reported trimmed base percentages are very high.
https://github.com/imgag/ngs-bits/blob/9e19e7ac7130220abb4adc9c241cccdfe4fbc89f/src/cppNGS/Statistics.cpp#L904
https://github.com/imgag/ngs-bits/blob/9e19e7ac7130220abb4adc9c241cccdfe4fbc89f/src/cppNGS/Statistics.cpp#L996
Does this parameter even make sense for long-read data? Because there is no adapter trimming (so far). Should we simply remove it for long-reads?
Calculation of trimmed base percentage assumes that all (most) alignments have the same length. For long read data, this is not valid. Reported trimmed base percentages are very high.
https://github.com/imgag/ngs-bits/blob/9e19e7ac7130220abb4adc9c241cccdfe4fbc89f/src/cppNGS/Statistics.cpp#L904
https://github.com/imgag/ngs-bits/blob/9e19e7ac7130220abb4adc9c241cccdfe4fbc89f/src/cppNGS/Statistics.cpp#L996