Open cmhulbert opened 11 months ago
...or Views.bundle
should return RandomAccessible<RandomAccess<T>>
?
Yeah, It could go either way. the only field in BundleView
is protected, so I think it would effectively be the same? I'm not sure what the thinking is with other View types, like IntervalView, but it may be nice to create BundleView
without View.bundle
or to subclass them, for example, a BundleView that takes an RAI and is itself also an RAI
I'm not sure what the thinking is with other View types, like IntervalView,
There is not much thinking... :-)
Actually, I would eventually prefer to hide all these special View types and have the Views
methods all return only basic RandomAccessible
, RandomAccessibleInterval
, etc...
Views.bundle returns a
BundleView
but the classBundleView
is not public, so effectivelyViews.bundle
cannot be used. I believeBundleView
should be public