search

iml-wg / HEPML-LivingReview

Living Review of Machine Learning for Particle Physics
https://iml-wg.github.io/HEPML-LivingReview
348 stars 105 forks source link

Year in paper titles would be great #112

Open Crashtime opened 2 years ago

Crashtime commented 2 years ago

Hello, thank you for constructing and maintaining this, our field needs it!

Would it be possible to include the year of the paper in the titles? I can add the years my self for what is there already.

Cheers

matthewfeickert commented 2 years ago

Would it be possible to include the year of the paper in the titles?

I'm -1 on this at the moment as I don't think this really adds much value in general and just adds in more metadata to something that is meant to be a simple listing and not a replication and not another database — we have INSPIRE for that.

If this was going to be implimented it would make more sense to revamp the project as a proper generated website and have this information just get grabbed from the INSPIRE API.

Can you elaborate on why you want the paper years in the title?

Crashtime commented 2 years ago

I understand! Thanks for the effort! It would be to be able to understand directly how recent the publications are. I am not a great website builder but I can write the code to get the info from the inspire api.

Cheers, João Pedro de Arruda Gonçalves

Matthew Feickert @.***> escreveu no dia sábado, 9/07/2022 à(s) 14:21:

Would it be possible to include the year of the paper in the titles?

I'm -1 on this at the moment as I don't think this really adds much value in general and just adds in more metadata to something that is meant to be a simple listing and not a replication and not another database — we have INSPIRE for that.

If this was going to be implimented it would make more sense to revamp the project as a proper generated website and have this information just get grabbed from the INSPIRE API.

Can you elaborate on why you want the paper years in the title?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/iml-wg/HEPML-LivingReview/issues/112#issuecomment-1179544386, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACRDMUTGDD6BLHXZKX32X2TVTF4GJANCNFSM53DDWWCQ . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

bnachman commented 2 years ago

I would be in favor of adding this, as I think it is nice to know the timescale. The papers are supposed to be ordered in time, but it can be nice to know how old certain papers are. @Crashtime would you be able to add this? I think it should be easy to grab from the existing metadata. We don't have to be super precise about arXiv date versus published date.

Crashtime commented 2 years ago

Thanks Ben! The distribution in time could be useful to see even if the papers are in chronological order. I can play around with the API and add this over this week. I would use the arxiv date if you agree.

On Sun, 10 Jul 2022, 00:22 Ben Nachman, @.***> wrote:

I would be in favor of adding this, as I think it is nice to know the timescale. The papers are supposed to be ordered in time, but it can be nice to know how old certain papers are. @Crashtime https://github.com/Crashtime would you be able to add this? I think it should be easy to grab from the existing metadata. We don't have to be super precise about arXiv date versus published date.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/iml-wg/HEPML-LivingReview/issues/112#issuecomment-1179620589, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACRDMUQTPZAK6QVB4FTB5MLVTICSNANCNFSM53DDWWCQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

bnachman commented 2 years ago

Great, thanks! arXiv date makes sense to me.

Crashtime commented 2 years ago

Hello,

I have made some alterations to the make_md.py file and was able to include the year, without the need for the arxiv API.

I created a new branch and would like to push it to the repo and follow with a merge request, is this possible?

Cheers, João Pedro de Arruda Gonçalves

Ben Nachman @.***> escreveu no dia segunda, 11/07/2022 à(s) 00:59:

Great, thanks! arXiv date makes sense to me.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/iml-wg/HEPML-LivingReview/issues/112#issuecomment-1179828283, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACRDMUSFIJGCWTAQE2RO2SLVTNPWPANCNFSM53DDWWCQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

ramonpeter commented 1 year ago

Hi @Crashtime,

I think you never send a PR, did you? Can you make the PR as explained in CONTRIBUTING.md? I can review it then. Thanks