Harmonize ShareLaTeX and GitHub

iml-wg / cwp

HEP Software Foundation Machine Learning Community White Paper Report

https://inspirehep.net/record/1681439/

BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License

0 stars 2 forks source link

Harmonize ShareLaTeX and GitHub #8

Closed matthewfeickert closed 6 years ago

matthewfeickert commented 6 years ago

@SergeiML has pointed out there are now discrepancies in the ShareLaTeX version (which has continued to be updated?) and the GitHub version.

participants.tex (updated by Omar, same authors you have already)
applications.tex (empty reference 2 removed)
main.tex (added abstract and conclusions)
conclusions.tex (new file)
roadmap.tex (updated text)

These will need to get harmonized in a PR after PR #7 is completed.

omazapa commented 6 years ago

Hi @matthewfeickert Yes, some updates was made in the document in sharelatex,

Abstract
Authors
Some sections also have some modifications from Sergei and Harrison.
Removed bad citation.

I think that we can take the sources from ShareLatex and upload it to github, what do you think?

Cheers, Omar.

matthewfeickert commented 6 years ago

@omazapa Directly, no, the structure is changed a bit, so it won't build out of the box if you do a direct dump. I can make a PR for this that actually gets the diffs once we understand how the author list has changed so that there isn't duplication of work from PR #7. Given that, do you have thoughts on this comment in Issue #5?